Username:   Remember Me

Uber Articles {Über (ger) adj. above, beyond }

- Above and Beyond a Mere Article Directory


Native Apps Vs Global Apps

By Ani George

Remember the days of yore where the mention of “apps” only stirred curious glances? Perhaps your handset was equipped with an Address Book, Calculator, SMS and a Brick Builder game thrown in for good measure. At that time, such features were device-specific and suitably highlighted in marketing material. Apps were brought to the fore in recent years, giving them their own domain totally isolating from their devices. That brings us to two big dominant players in this segment with their own business models. One player relies on native apps while the other on global mobile apps. Yes, I’m referring to Apple’s iOS with its device specific (iPhone, iPod, iPad, Mac) native apps and Google’s Android with its global apps featured across various devices.

When iPhone entered the smartphone market, its critical acclaim came from iPhone apps. Apple based its iPhone ecosystem around the App Store. Native apps gained popularity through iOS although Nokia pioneered this native apps concept with its Symbian OS (later distributed to other OEMs). In the world of mobile app development, designing native apps for a platform or device bring in their own set of advantages.

1. Built Around the Device: App developers can make full use of the device’s hardware potential while coding native apps.

2. Pre-Installed Package: Native apps can be coded using the specific OS’s SDK to be supplied as pre-installed package on a device. This will help the OEM give the device a premium positioning.

3. Platform Specific Apps for Niche Segment: Native app developers derive huge benefits from coding platform specific native apps targeting the niche segment. Apple’s SIRI iPhone app is a good example which Apple patented to make it an iOS exclusive. Other players have tried to replicate it with limited success.

Global apps scalable across platforms and global mobile apps distributed across different OEMs complete the other end of the spectrum. Google’s Android OS is the dominant player with its Google Play mobile app store. Android apps seem to be closing the gap with iPhone apps in terms of number of downloads. Reasons could be many for this shifting trend but a few points as to why global apps are find wider acceptance could be:

1. Gain for OEMs: Smartphone manufacturers stand to gain by licensing the OS and mobile apps from the developer. OEMs don’t have to invest on R&D for proprietary OS or hire developers for mobile apps. Makes more business sense to simply license them out, like in the case of Google’s Android. It’s licensed free under the Open Handset Alliance (OHA). Android apps can be customised for the OS or the device by the OEM.

2. Available across Devices: The end user gets to use his favourite app across devices. Like in the case of Android apps, he can use it on any Android based smartphone.

3. Bigger Target Market: Android app developers gain to have access to a larger target market due to the sheer number of devices that run Android. The probability of an Android app hitting success is greater due to the larger target market. Native apps or global apps, both have their share of the app market and one cannot be placed over the other.

Software Developers India is a leading mobile app development company designing native as well as global apps. You have the idea, we have the right app developer, be it an Android app or an iPhone app. Get in touch with us on or call 408 802 2885  to know how we could build your own iPhone or Android app.

Article kindly provided by

Topics: Computers and Technology | Comments Off

Tags: , , ,

Article Citation
MLA Style Citation:
George, Ani "Native Apps Vs Global Apps." Native Apps Vs Global Apps. 10 Apr. 2013. 2 Aug 2014 <>.

APA Style Citation:
George, A (2013, April 10). Native Apps Vs Global Apps. Retrieved August 2, 2014, from

Chicago Style Citation:
George, Ani "Native Apps Vs Global Apps"

Reprint Rights

Creative Commons License
This article is subject to a revocable license under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivative Works 3.0 Unported License, which means you may freely reprint it, in its entirety, provided you include the author's resource box along with LIVE VISIBLE links (without "nofollow" tags). We may revoke the license at any time with or without cause. You must also include the credit to

Comments are closed.

Uber Articles and its partner sites cannot be held responsible for either the content nor the originality of any articles. If you believe the article has been stolen from you without your permission, please contact us and we will remove it immediately. If you have a problem with the accuracy or otherwise of the content of an article, please contact the author, not us! Also, please remember that any opinions and ideas presented in any of the articles are those of the author and cannot be taken to represent the opinions of Uber Articles. All articles are provided for informational purposes only. None of them should be relied upon for medical, psychological, financial, legal, or other professional advice. If you need professional advice, see a professional. We cannot be held responsible for any use or misuse you make of the articles, nor can we be held responsible for any claims for earnings, cures, or other results that the article might make.
  • RSS Feed

    RSS for Computers and Technology