By Marta Jensen
Previously due to strict regulations and less opportunities for making profits manager incentives had limited upsides. But in today’s deregulated and competitive environment financial executives are paid mainly on how they have performed compared to certain benchmark; it’s not measured in absolute terms. Mostly this benchmark is peer performance or a particular index which they trade or track. Like a fund manager’s performance that is trading over S&P 500 would be measured on how he/the portfolio has performed compared to the S&P 500.
What investors are majorly looking is how has a manager outperformed the benchmark (i.e. alpha) or his peers and that’s how he gets the payment; the more the alpha the more he gets paid. When we look at other industries a financial manager’s major aim is to increase the shareholder’s wealth. The more the wealth creation the more is the pay of the executive. Also if the investors are dissatisfied they would take their money somewhere else, ending the job of the manager.
Since compensation is related to returns, there is less downside and more upside in generating returns, implying there is rewards for positive returns which exceed the penalties for negative returns. For example we look at the hedge fund payment structure. If hedge funds payment to their managers is seen they have a ‘high water mark’ clause which implies that suppose in year 1 the return is 110% the manager would get paid for the 10% earnings, the next year its 125% so he will get paid for increasing the return by 15%. But then in the third year the return falls to 105% that particular year the manager gets no payment in fact he won’t be paid till the return crosses 125% as that’s the highest return he has achieved till date.
This situation creates a moral hazard as the financial executives think about increasing the wealth or their firm or the investors or shareholders and thus their wealth also but forget about risks that they would be exposing the firm to and apart from their firms the other firms, the whole industry, and economy as a whole.
Thus we see that managers are induced to take higher risks so that they can earn more. This has bought about a few practices by the managers which results in taking excessive risks. A couple of those would be hidden tail risk and herding behavior.
Hidden tail risk usually yields positive returns. However, this risk also carries a possibility of huge negative returns. For example, guarantee selling by the insurance companies against defaulting companies in the credit derivatives market. IN normal times the insurance companies make profits by collecting the premiums from the guarantee buyers. But if the company defaults, the guarantor is obliged to pay out a hefty amount. Hidden tail risks are not only unobservable to the investors but they are typically not included in the comparison benchmark. Thus the manager will be able to earn higher returns which would distinguish a manager from both his peers as well as the benchmark, leading to higher rewards in compensation. Also another advantage for the managers is that the high returns so generated could last for long period of time before showing their true colors in the event of a high negative outcome.
Herding occurs when a manger follows the trend and adopts the similar investment strategies as their peer group. Herding drives assets prices away from their fundamentals and the odds of succeeding by going against the massive trend is slight. There is a relatively limited time horizon to reverse any relative negative trend so there is a higher possibility of losing investors if the returns drift in the wrong direction. Herding provides a manager insurance that he would not underperform the benchmark. For example, the investment manager may buy a single stock from a major index, such as S&P 500, that moves in the same direction as that of the index, but with less volatility than other similar stocks in the index. While realizing that the stock may be overvalued, the investment manager’s herding behavior follows the logic that his performance will not be worse than the benchmark if in fact the index heads downwards.
Thus the subprime crisis was result of such managers’ behaviors where they failed to understand where risks were and how much risk should be sufficient in the drive to earn higher returns. Most managers were just making loans to the borrowers, especially the NINJA loans with thinking about the future as to whether these loans would be paid up or not, and they did not care much as these loans were securitized so the bank would not have bear the brunt but some investor who had made the investment would. Also there was immense financial engineering just to increase the rewards for them.
Article kindly provided by UberArticles.com
Topics: Miscellaneous | Comments Off
MLA Style Citation:
Jensen, Marta "Should The Government Be Capping The Pay Of Financial Executives?." Should The Government Be Capping The Pay Of Financial Executives?. 27 Jun. 2010. uberarticles.com. 17 Feb 2016 <http://uberarticles.com/miscellaneous/should-the-government-be-capping-the-pay-of-financial-executives/>.
APA Style Citation:
Jensen, M (2010, June 27). Should The Government Be Capping The Pay Of Financial Executives?. Retrieved February 17, 2016, from http://uberarticles.com/miscellaneous/should-the-government-be-capping-the-pay-of-financial-executives/
Chicago Style Citation:
Jensen, Marta "Should The Government Be Capping The Pay Of Financial Executives?" uberarticles.com. http://uberarticles.com/miscellaneous/should-the-government-be-capping-the-pay-of-financial-executives/
Comments are closed.
Uber Articles and its partner sites cannot be held responsible for either the content nor the originality of any articles. If you believe the article has been stolen from you without your permission, please contact us and we will remove it immediately. If you have a problem with the accuracy or otherwise of the content of an article, please contact the author, not us! Also, please remember that any opinions and ideas presented in any of the articles are those of the author and cannot be taken to represent the opinions of Uber Articles. All articles are provided for informational purposes only. None of them should be relied upon for medical, psychological, financial, legal, or other professional advice. If you need professional advice, see a professional. We cannot be held responsible for any use or misuse you make of the articles, nor can we be held responsible for any claims for earnings, cures, or other results that the article might make.